An institutional approach to developing a culture of student persistence
There continues to be increasing focus on college student retention and persistence. This focus is coming from the United States federal government, accrediting organizations, and from students, parents, and the public. Given the spiraling costs of education and the fact that retention rates have not improved over time, various stakeholders are concerned about the value of a higher education credential. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the efforts of a for-profit, distance education institution to focus its resources, in an evidence-based manner, on retention and to develop a culture of retention and persistence throughout the institution. The literature review and analysis of internal initiatives demonstrated that (a) institutions must make a commitment to retention, include retention efforts as part of its strategic plan, and provide resources to support retention efforts; (b) mastery of knowledge of the research on retention and persistence is critical for designing evidence-based interventions; and (c) institutions should identify, develop, and implement pilot projects aimed at improving student progress and share results to help stimulate development of best practices throughout higher education.
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (ACSFA) (2012). Pathways to success: Integrating learning with life and work to increase national college completion (Report to the U.S. Congress and the Secretary of Education). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov
Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu
American College Testing. (2010). National collegiate retention and persistence to degree rates [Policy paper]. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/
American College Testing. (2012). National collegiate retention and persistence to degree rates [Policy paper]. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297-308.
Bean, J. P. (2005). Nine themes of college student retention. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 215-244). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485
Bell, N. E. (2008). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 1997-2007. Washington, D.C.: Council of Graduate Schools.
Berger, J. B., & Braxton, J. M. (1998). Revising Tinto's interactionist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 103-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018760513769
Berger, J. B., Ramirez, G. B., & Lyons, S. (2012). Past to present: A historical look at retention. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for success (2nd. ed., pp. 7-34). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Boston, W., & Ice, P. (2011). Assessing retention in online learning: An administrative perspective. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/
Boston, W., Ice, P., Diaz, S. R., Richardson, J., Gibson, A. M., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67-83.
Braxton, J. M., Shaw Sullivan, A. V., & Johnson, R. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 107-164). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
Britto, M., & Rush, S. (2013). Developing and implementing comprehensive student support services for online students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 29-42.
Burkholder, G. J., Smeaton, G., Jobe, R., & Lenio, J. (2008, August). Facilitating student completion of independent research: Strategies for success. Symposium session presented at the 116th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Department of Education. (2011, June 2). Obama administration announces new steps to protect students from ineffective career college programs [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/
Dorn, S. M., & Papalewis, R. (1997, March). Improving doctoral student retention. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting: Talking Together in Educational Research & Practice, Chicago, IL.
Finnegan, C., Morris, L. V., & Lee, K. (2009). Differences by course discipline on student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses of undergraduate general education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 10(1), 39-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.d
Golde, C.M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/he.10105
Hagedorn, L. S., Moon, H. S., Cypers, S., Maxwell, W. E., & Lester, J. (2006). Transfer between community colleges and four-year colleges: The all American game. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(3), 223-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10668920500322384
Harrell, I. L., & Bower, B. L. (2011). Student characteristics that predict persistence in community college online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 178-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2011.590107
Kember, D. (1999). Integrating part-time study with family, work and social obligations. Studies in Higher Education, 24(1), 109-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331380178
Lenio, J., Holland, N., Cantu, C., Fink, N., Francis, S., & Baur, D. (2009, June 3). Examining the effect of academic residencies on the retention of online PhD students. Paper presented at the 49th Association of Institutional Research Annual Forum: World Class Institutional Research, Atlanta, GA.
Longwell-Grice, R., & Longwell-Grice, H. (2008). Testing Tinto: How do retention theories work for first- generation, working-class students? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(4), 407-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.4.a
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
McCracken, M. (2009). Best practices in supporting persistence in distance education student through integrated web-based systems. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 10(1), 65-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.f
Metz, G. W. (2005). Challenge and changes to Tinto's persistence theory: A historical review. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(2), 191-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/M2CC-R7Y1-WY2Q-UPK5
Metzner, B., & Bean, J. (1987). The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Research in Higher Education 27(1), 15-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00992303
Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2009). Best practices in predicting and encouraging student persistence and achievement online. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 10(1), 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.e
Nora, A. (2002). The depiction of significant others in Tinto's "Rites of Passage": A reconceptualization of the influence of family and community in the persistence process. Journal of College Student: Research, Theory & Practice, 3(1), 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/BYT5-9F05-7F6M-5YCM
Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decisions to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 207-217.
Riedel, E., & Lenio, J. (2010, May 29-June 2). Understanding community among online adult learners. Paper presented at the 50th Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum: Charting Our Future in Higher Education, Chicago, IL.
Saenz, V. B., Hurtado, S., Barrera, D., Wolf, D., & Yeung, F. (2007). First in my family: A profile of first-generation college students at four-year institutions since 1971. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
Salter, D. (2012). Online student retention. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 211-227). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
Seidman, A., (ed.) (2005). College student retention: Formula for student success. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
Seidman, A. (ed.) (2012). College student retention: Formula for student success (2nd ed.). New York, NY: ACE/Rowman & Littlefield.
Silverman, L., & Seidman, A. (2011-2012). Academic progress in developmental math courses: A comparative study of student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(3), 267-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.3.a
Sutton, S., & Nora, A. (2008-2009). An exploration of college persistence for students enrolled in web-enhanced courses: A multivariate analytic approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 10(1), 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.c
Swail, W.S. (2004, June 21). The art of student retention: A handbook for practitioners and administrators. Paper presented at the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 20th Annual Recruitment and Retention Conference, Austin, TX, Education Policy Institute.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001
The White House. (2012, January 27). President Obama’s blueprint for keeping college affordable and within reach for all Americans [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/
The White House. (2103a). Education: Knowledge and skills for the jobs of the future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/
The White House. (2013b, February 12). The President’s plan for a strong middle class and a strong America. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Labor, Education, and Pensions. (2012, July 30). For-profit higher education: The failure to safeguard the federal investment and ensure student success, S. Prt. 112-37, Vol. 1. Retrieved from http://www.help.senate.gov
Walden University (2010). Walden University Admissions Committee Review. Unpublished study.
Copyright (c) 2013 Gary J Burkholder, Jim Lenio, Nicole Holland, Rebecca Jobe, Alan Seidman, Diane Neal, Jimmy Middlebrook
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.