Motivation and career-development training programs: Use of regulatory focus to determine program effectiveness
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to focus on the relationship between career-development training programs and the motivation of employees. The study used a qualitative method and a phenomenological design using semistructured interviews conducted with a script of open-ended questions. Two main components of the research design were the modified van Kaam method for exploration of experiences and the purposive selection of the participants. The 20 participants in the sample were project managers and consultants from south-central Texas, all of whom had experience with governmental projects. Based on interview responses, the findings of this study highlighted a concern from the participants that training programs have a major influence on workplace productivity and morale. Furthermore, the findings suggest the training program’s quality may influence workplace productivity. The authors conclude by pointing out the analysis of the answers showed that not only does workplace productivity decline from the changes in a training program, but employee motivation is altered as well.
Beausaert, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2011). The Personal Development Plan Practice Questionnaire: The development and validation of an instrument to assess the employee’s perception of personal development plan practice. International Journal of Training & Development, 15, 249–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00375.x
Carter, C. A. (2011, April 26). The influence of business ownership and selected demographic characteristics on the perceived effectiveness of an entrepreneurship training program among female participants. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04212011-091948/
Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59, 487–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
Farooq, M., & Khan, M. A. (2011). Impact of training and feedback on employee performance. Far East Journal of Psychology & Business, 5(1), 23–33. Retrieved from http://www.fareastjournals.com/
Freeman, E. W. (2009). Training effectiveness: The influence of personal achievement goals on post- training self-efficacy (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3395162)
Gaither, K. A. (2009). Comparing perceived effectiveness of e-learning and traditional training in the business environment (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3362657)
Halvorson, H. G., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Know what really motivates you. Harvard Business Review, 91(3), 117–120. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/magazine
Hameed, A., & Waheed, A. (2011). Employee development and its effect on employee performance: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business & Social Science, 2(13), 224–229. Retrieved from http://www.ijbssnet.com/
Hardman, W., & Robertson, L. (2012). What motivates employees to persist with online training? One Canadian workplace study. International Journal of Business, Humanities & Technology, 2(5), 66–78. Retrieved from http://www.ijbhtnet.com/
Higgins, E. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x
Higgins, E. T., Cesario, J., Hagiwara, N., Spiegel, S., & Pittman, T. (2010). Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: The role of regulatory fit. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 98, 559–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018833
Hutchins, H. M., Burke, L. A., & Berthelsen, A. M. (2010). A missing link in the transfer problem? Examining how trainers learn about training transfer. Human Resource Management, 49, 599–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20371
Kohn, S. L. (2009). The effects of choice and training reputation on training effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3367278)
Maddox, W. T., & Markman, A. B. (2012). The motivation-cognition interface in learning and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 106-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721410364008
Mankins, M., Bird, A., & Root, J. (2013). Making star teams out of star players. Harvard Business Review, 91(1/2), 74–78. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/magazine
Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2012). The relationship between leader motivating language and self- efficacy: A partial least squares model analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 357–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943612456036
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Partnership for Public Service. (2012). Best places to work in the federal government 2012. Partnership for Public Service. Retrieved from http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/overall/
Richmond, S. P. (2009). Job readiness training: A qualitative study of select programs in the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3352336)
Rodgers, L. (2010). Time to train rights: A new impetus for skills development in the workplace? Industrial Law Journal, 39(3), 312–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwq016
Weide, J. L. (2014). The Role of Regulatory Focus in Determining Career-Development Training Program Effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No.3615491)
Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Measuring the impact and value of training programs: A qualitative study of selected programs in the Workforce and Economic Development Network in Pennsylvania (WEDnetPA) (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3459596)
Copyright (c) 2015 Peter John Anthony, Jeffrey Weide
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.