Online college laboratory courses: Can they be done and will they affect graduation and retention rates?
Online education has been steadily growing during the last decade. This growth has mainly taken place in the non-laboratory science fields. This essay describes some of the best practices to increase and maintain student retention, increase student engagement and increase graduation rates for college running online laboratory science courses. This article further discusses how to run successful, hands-on laboratory courses for your online students. The most common issues are being discussed and what can be done to provide the students with the same hands-on experience online as what they would experience in a more traditional classroom setting.
Adelman, C. (2006, February). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Education. Retrieved from https://www.edpubs.gov/
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013, January). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED541571)
Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 10-19. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ904059)
Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-14. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ907749)
Bird, K. (2014, February 19). Online vs. traditional education: The answer you never expected [Blog post]. College Life Blog. Retrieved from http://www.rasmussen.edu/student-life/blogs/college-life/
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ601725)
Comparing the graduation rates between online and traditional colleges. (n. d.). College Classes. Retrieved from http://www.collegeclasses.com
Dennis, B. D. (2014). Examining and testing the use of an online orientation. Assessment Fellows Grant [Paper No. 30]. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/
Eaton, C. (2011, December 5). At White House meeting on affordability, a call for urgency, innovation, and leadership. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com
Executive Office of the President. (2015, January). Community-based broadband solutions: The benefits of competition and choice for community development and highspeed internet access. Washington, DC: The White House,
Erichsen, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2010). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 309-326. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11423-010-9161-6
Garza-Mitchel, R. L. (2014). Case study: Texas State Technocal College Harlingen—Online orientation to improve student success. The Community College Enterprise, 20(2), 88-92.
Ginder, S., & Stearns, C. (2014, June). Web tables: Enrollment in distance education courses, by state: Fall 2012. [NCES Pub. No. 2014-023]. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/
Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the Literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19-42.
Haynie, D. (2015, January 30). Experts debate graduation rates for online students. US News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com
Heyman, E. (2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/
Johnson, N., & Bell, A. (2014). Scaling completion college services as a model for increasing adult degree completion. Indianapolis, IN: Lumia Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED555863)
Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Holzweiss, P. C., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). The importance of student-instructor connections in graduate level online courses. Journal of Online Learning and teaching, 10(3), 436-445. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2010). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2012). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 328-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T, Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
Lohr, S. (2009, August 19). Study shows online education is better than classroom education. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Lynch-Newberg, S. A. (2010). The retention, success, and progress rates of rural females in traditional lecture and online developmental mathematics courses (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3452860).
McCalmont, W. F. (2013). The feasibility of distance learning with the traditional laboratory-based chemistry class. Paper presented as partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. Retrieved from http://www.usma.edu
Meyer, K., Bruwelheide, J., & Poulin, R. (2009). Why they stayed: Near-perfect retention in an online certification program in library media. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 129-145. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ862361)
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Radford, A. W., Cominole, M., & Skomsvold, P. (2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates: 2011-12 [NCES Pub. No. 2015-025]. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/
Regalado, M. A. (2009, May 15). As more try online classes, tech issues arise. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com
Stack, S. (2015). Learning outcomes in an online vs traditional course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), Art. 5. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol9/iss1/5
The trouble with online college [Editorial]. (2013, February 18). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
WestEd. (2008). Evaluating online learning: Challenges and strategies for success [Report No. ED 004344P]. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Education. Retrieved from https://www.edpubs.gov/
Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115-127. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ862360)
Wilson, D., & Allen, D. (2011). Success rates of online versus traditional college students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 14, 1-9.
Copyright (c) 2015 Eddy van Hunnik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.