Exploring the Relationship Between Students with Accommodations and Instructor Self-Efficacy in Complying with Accommodations
The willingness and flexibility of university instructors to comply with and provide accommodations for students with disabilities is critical to academic success. The authors examine how communication between students needing accommodations and university instructors impacts instructor self-efficacy, or instructors’ perception that they can meet the accommodation. Specifically, the authors’ explored the relationship between student self-disclosure of a disability and instructor empathy, flexibility, and self-efficacy in meeting student accommodation needs. Results revealed that the more a student self-discloses about a needed accommodation, the more self-efficacy an instructor has in making that accommodation. For the low-disclosure condition, empathy and flexibility were both significant predictors of self-efficacy, whereas, for the high-disclosure condition, only flexibility was a significant predictor of self-efficacy. Finally, instructors’ levels of empathy and flexibility both decreased after reading both the high and low self-disclosure scenarios.
Baer, W. (1997). Teaching strategies and accommodations for students with disabilities. In B. Hodge & J. Preston-Sabin (Eds.), Accommodations—Or just good teaching? Strategies for teaching college students with disabilities (pp. 126–131). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Barrett, B. (1997). Explaining learning disabilities to colleagues: Treatment and accommodation. In B. Hodge & J. Preston-Sabin (Eds.), Accommodations—Or just good teaching? Strategies for teaching college students with disabilities (pp. 2–4). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Bento, R. F. (1996). Faculty decision-making about “reasonable accommodations” for disabled college students: Informational, ethical and attitudinal issues. College Student Journal, 30, 494–501. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj_2006.html
Berman, J. (2004). Empathetic teaching: Education for life. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Burgstahler, S., & Russo-Gleicher, R. J. (2015). Applying universal design to address the needs of postsecondary students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 199–212. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
Cole, E. V., & Cawthon, S. W. (2015). Self-disclosure decisions of university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 163–179. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
Cornett-Devito, M. M., & Worley, C. W. (2005). A front row seat: A phenomenological investigation of learning disabilities. Communication Education, 54, 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500442178
Denhart, H. (2008). Deconstructing barriers: Perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408321151
Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology. (2015, August 24). What is the difference between accommodation and modification for a student with a disability? Retrieved from University of Washington website: http://www.washington.edu/doit/ what-difference-between-accommodation-and-modification-student-disability
Docan-Morgan, T. (2011). “Everything changed”: Relational turning point events in college teacher-student relationships from teachers’ perspectives. Communication Education, 60, 20–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.497223
Frymier, A. B., & Wanzer, M. B. (2003). Examining differences in perceptions of students’ communication with professors: A comparison of students with and without disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 51, 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370309370149
Hadley, W. (2016). The four-year college experience of one student with multiple learning disabilities. College Student Journal, 51, 19–28. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.com/college-student-journal.html
Hall, T., Vue, G., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (Links updated 2014). Retrieved August 1, 2012, from http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2003/ncac-differentiated-instruction-udl.html
Hartman-Hall, H. M., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2002). College students’ willingness to seek help for their learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511357
Hunter, M., & Barker, G. (1987). “If at first…”: Attribution theory in the classroom. Educational Leadership, 45, 50–53.
Integrating reasonable accommodations as a part of good teaching. (1997). In B. Hodge & J. Preston-Sabin (Eds.), Accommodations—Or just good teaching Strategies for teaching college students with disabilities (pp. 23–27). Westport, CT: Praeger.
King, H. L., Aguinaga, N., O’Brien, C., Young, W., & Zgonc, K. (2010). Disability in higher education: A position paper. American Annals of the Deaf, 155, 386–391. Retrieved from http://gupress.gallaudet.edu/annals/ https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2010.0019
Leithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Lynch, R. T., & Gussel, L. (2001). Disclosure and self-advocacy regarding disability-related needs: Strategies to maximize integration in postsecondary education. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01879.x
Madaus, J. W., Foley, T. E., McGuire, J. M., & Ruban, L. M. (2002). Employment self-disclosure of postsecondary graduates with learning disabilities: Rates and rationales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350040701
Murray, C., Flannery, B. K., & Wren, C. (2008). University staff members’ attitudes and knowledge about learning disabilities and disability support services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(2), 73–90. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
Murray, C., Wren, C. T., & Keys, C. (2008). University faculty perceptions of students with learning disabilities: Correlates and group differences. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 95–113.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Chapter 3: Postsecondary education. In Digest of education statistics: 2014. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/ch_3.asp
Newman, L. A., & Madaus, J. M. (2015). Reported accommodations and supports provided to secondary and postsecondary students with disabilities: National Perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413518235
Orr, A. C., & Hammig, S. B. (2009). Inclusive postsecondary strategies for teaching students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740367
Palmer, C., & Roessler, R. T. (2000). Requesting classroom accommodations: Self-advocacy and conflict resolution training for college students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66, 38–43.
Powell, R. G, & Powell, D. L. (2010). Classroom communication and diversity: Enhancing instructional practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Price, L. A., & Gerber, P. J. (2001). At second glance: Employers and employees with learning disabilities in the Americans With Disabilities Act era. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400301
Quinlan, M. M., Bates, B. R., & Angell, M. E. (2012). ‘What can I do to help?’: Postsecondary students with learning disabilities perception of instructors’ classroom accommodations. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 12(4), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01225.x
Roberts, E. L., Ju, S., & Zhang, D. (2016). Review of practices that promote self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 26(4), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207314540213
Salzberg, C. L., Peterson, L., Debrand, C. C., Blair, R. J., Carsey, A. C., & Johnson, A. S. (2002). Opinions of disability service directors on faculty training: The need, content, issues, formats, media, and activities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15(2), 101–114. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ653970
Scott, S. S., & Gregg, N. (2000). Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for college students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300204
Simonds, C. J., & Cooper, P. J. (2011). Communication for the classroom teacher (9th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Wood, W. M., Brewer, D. M., & Eddy, S. (2005). A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 26(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260010601
Trimmis, N., & Bessas, A. (2016). University faculty beliefs about students with learning disabilities. Educational Alternatives, 14, 287–295. Retrieved from https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/open-access-journals/educational-alternatives/
Vogel, S. A., Leyser, Y., Wyland, S., & Brulle, A. (1999). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Faculty attitude and practices. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1403_5
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206
Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
Weiner, B. (2010). Attribution theory. In Peterson, P. L., Baker, E. L., & McGaw, B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 558–563). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00600-X
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.