Designing a Peer-Mentoring Program for Education Doctorate (EdD) Students
A Literature Review
Objectives: In preparation for creating a peer-mentoring program for education doctorate (EdD) students, we conducted a literature review to learn about the characteristics of peer-mentoring programs for graduate students and EdD students specifically.
Method: Our search criteria included articles about peer mentoring for graduate students only; published in peer-reviewed journals since the year 2000; and about programs that involved more experienced students, students farther along in the program, or recent graduates. These criteria resulted in 15 articles.
Results: We applied what we learned about program design and characteristics in the creation of a voluntary peer-mentoring program for first year students, including purposeful selection and assignment of mentors and mentees along with stated expectations for the type and frequency of mentor/mentee conversations.
Conclusions: More research is needed that addresses a consistent definition of peer mentoring, methodological concerns about research, challenges of these programs, and how certain aspects of peer-mentoring programs relate to program completion rates.
Implications for Theory and/or Practice: Continued investigation into the benefits and challenges of mentoring programs will inform our service to students. Investigation into multiple programs and peer mentoring in the later stages of the doctoral journey will strengthen the extant literature about peer mentoring for doctoral students.
Bista, K., & Cox, D. W. (2014). Cohort-based doctoral programs: What we have learned over the last 18 years. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28945/1941
Booth, S., Merga, M., & Roni, S. M. (2016). Peer-mentors reflect on the benefits of mentoring: An autoethnography. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 383–402. https://doi.org/10.28945/3603
Bottoms, S., Pegg, J., Adams, A., Wu, K., Risser, H. S., & Kern, A. L. (2013). Mentoring from the outside: The role of a peer-mentoring community in the development of early career education faculty. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2013.813730
Budge, S. (2006). Peer mentoring in post-secondary education: Implications for research and practice. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2006.10850194
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
Cutright, T. J., & Evans, E. (2016). Year-long peer-mentoring activity to enhance the retention of freshmen STEM students in a NSF scholarship program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1222811
Douglass, A. G., Smith, D. L., & Smith, L. J. (2013). An exploration of the characteristics of effective undergraduate peer-mentoring relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2013.813740
Erickson, D. E., & Travick-Jackson, C. (2006). Creating community through mentoring. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 2, 262–270.
Ferguson, H., & Wheat, K. L. (2015). Early career academic mentoring using Twitter: The case of #ECRchat. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.991533
Fleck, C., & Mullins, M. E. (2012). Evaluating a psychology graduate student peer mentoring program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.687157
Goff, L. (2011). Evaluating the outcomes of a peer-mentoring program for students transitioning to postsecondary education. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.2.2
Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637–642.
Harnish, D., & Wild, L. A. (1993). Faculty peer mentoring: A strategy for improving instruction. Community College Journal, 64(1), 22–27.
Heirdsfield, A. M., Walker, S., Walsh, K., & Wilss, L. (2008). Peer mentoring for first-year teacher education students: The mentors’ experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260801916135
Holley, K. A., & Caldwell, M. L. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
Holt, L. J., & Lopez, M. J. (2014). Characteristics and correlates of supportive peer mentoring: A mixed methods study. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(5), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.983326
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., & Faber, S. T. (2016). Benefits of peer mentoring to mentors, female mentees and higher education institutions. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1170560
Kerrigan, M. R., & Hayes, K. M. (2016). EdD students’ self-efficacy and interest in conducting research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.28945/3413
Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110–132.
Lin, Y. (2014). Perspectives on peer mentoring from Taiwanese science and engineering master’s students. Education, 135(1), 79–92.
McCarthy, J., Trenga, M. E., & Weiner, B. (2005). The cohort model with graduate student learners: Faculty-student perspectives. Adult Learning, 16(3/4), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950501600305
Morales, E. E., Ambrose-Roman, S., & Perez-Maldonado, R. (2016). Transmitting success: Comprehensive peer mentoring for at-risk students in developmental math. Innovative Higher Education, 41(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9335-6
Mullen, C. A., & Tuten, E. M. (2010). Doctoral cohort mentoring: Interdependence, collaborative learning, and cultural change. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 4(1), 11–32.
Murakami, E. T., & Nuñez, A. (2014). Latina faculty transcending barriers: Peer mentoring in a Hispanic-serving institution. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.945739
Noonan, M. J., Ballinger, R., & Black, R. (2007). Peer and faculty mentoring in doctoral education: Definitions, experiences, and expectations. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 251–262.
Nuñez, A., Murakami, E. T., & Gonzales, L. D. (2015). Weaving authenticity and legitimacy: Latina faculty peer mentoring. New Directions for Higher Education, 2015(171), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20145
Packer-Williams, C. L., & Evans, K. M. (2011). Retaining and reclaiming ourselves: Reflections on a peer-mentoring group experience for new African American women professors. Perspectives in Peer Programs, 23(1), 9–23.
Pidgeon, M., Archibald, J., & Hawkey, C. (2014). Relationships matter: Supporting Aboriginal graduate students in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 1–21.
Preston, J. P., Ogenchuk, M. J., & Nsiah, J. K. (2014). Peer mentorship and transformational learning: PhD student experiences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 52–68.
Rawlinson, C., & Willimot, M. (2016). Social justice, learning centredness and a first year experience peer-mentoring program: How might they connect? Journal of Peer Learning, 9(2016), 41–48.
Rees, A., & Shaw, K. (2014). Peer mentoring communities of practice for early and mid-career faculty: Broad benefits from a research-oriented female peer-mentoring group. Journal of Faculty Development, 28(2), 5–17.
Rios-Ellis, B., Rascón, M., Galvez, G., Inzunza-Franco, G., Bellamy, L., & Torres, A. (2015). Creating a model of Latino peer education: Weaving cultural capital into the fabric of academic services in an urban university setting. Education and Urban Society, 47(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512468006
Risquez, A., & Sanchez-Garcia, M. (2012). The jury is still out: Psychoemotional support in peer e-mentoring for transition to university. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.003
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Spaulding, L. S., & Bade, B. (2014). Completion of educational doctorates: How universities can foster persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.28945/2072
Ruane, R., & Lee, V. J. (2016). Analysis of discussion board interaction in an online peer mentoring site. Online Learning, 20(4), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1052
Seed, A. H. (2008). Cohort building through experiential learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100207
Seifert, K., & Mandzuk, D. (2006). Student cohorts in teacher education: Support groups or intellectual communities? Teachers College Record, 108(7), 1296–1320.
Shotton, H. J., Oosahwe, E. S. L., & Cintrón, R. (2007). Stories of success: Experiences of American Indian students in a peer-mentoring retention program. Review of Higher Education, 31(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0060
Smailes, J., & Gannon-Leary, P. (2011). Peer mentoring – Is a virtual form of support a viable alternative? Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10351
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Scielzo, S. A., Yarbrough, C. S., & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004
Terrion, J. L., & Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: Findings from a literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086311
Terrion, J. L., & Philion, R. (2008). The electronic journal as reflection-on-action: A qualitative analysis of communication and learning in a peer-mentoring program. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802373073
Thomas, N., Bystydzienski, J., & Desai, A. (2015). Changing institutional culture through peer mentoring of women STEM faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 40(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9
Vaill, A. L., & Testori, P. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i2.256
Ward, E. G., Thomas, E. E., & Disch, W. B. (2014). Mentor service themes emergent in a holistic, undergraduate peer-mentoring experience. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0058
Webb, A. K., Wangmo, T., Ewen, H. H., Teaster, P. B., & Hatch, L. R. (2009). Peer and faculty mentoring for students pursuing a PhD in gerontology. Educational Gerontology, 35(12), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270902917869
Wergin, J. F. (2011). Rebooting the EdD. Harvard Educational Review, 81(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.1.fp775268x77n0122
Yob, I. M., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(2), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.