Blogs, webinars and significant learning: A case report on a teacher training program for college teachers
This case study reports on a teacher training experience for college professors in which participants were trained, taking advantage of technological tools, in two main teaching competences. First, professors were trained to use technology to enrich students’ learning outcomes. Second, they applied strategies of significant learning in the design of students’ learning experiences. The learning experience consisted in an International Certificate on Significant Learning integrated by six modules, 20 hours each. Every module of the program consisted of two consecutive webinars with online activities in between. The results showed the positive impact of the program on participants’ perceptions about the quality of the contents, evidence of learning and products (E-portfolios) that served as content mastery evidences, as well as learning products produced by their students.
Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
Badia, A. (2006). Ayuda al aprendizaje con tecnología en la educación superior. RU&SC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(2), 5-19. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78030208
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (2000). Teaching to promote intellectual and personal maturity: incorporating students’ worldviews and identities into the learning process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755
Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Bustos Sánchez, A., & Coll Salvador, C. (2010). Los entornos virtuales como espacios de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Una perspectiva psicoeducativa para su caracterización y análisis. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(44), 163-184. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14012513009
Bustos Sánchez, A., Coll Salvador, C., & Engel Rocamora, A. (2009). Presencia docente distribuida en redes asincrónicas de aprendizaje: Definición teórica y perspectiva multi método para su estudio. In F. Barriga Arceo, G. Hernández Rojas & M. Rigo Lemini (Eds.), Aprender y enseñar con TIC en educación superior: contribuciones del socioconstructivismo (pp. 97-128). México. D.F.: UNAM.
Coll, C., & Monereo, C. (Eds.). (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual: aprender y enseñar con las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Morata.
Díaz Barriga, F. (2006). Enseñanza situada: Vínculo entre la escuela y la vida. México, DF: McGraw-Hill.
Díaz Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2004). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista. México: McGraw-Hill.
Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463
Haskell, R.E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hernández Rojas, G. (2009). Las TIC como herramientas para pensar e interpensar: Un análisis conceptual y reflexiones sobre su empleo. In F. Barriga Arceo, G. Hernández Rojas, & M. Rigo Lemini (Eds.), Aprender y enseñar con TIC en educación superior: contribuciones del socioconstructivismo (pp. 18-62). México, DF: UNAM.
Omrod, J. (1999). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril/Prentice-Hall.
Polanco, R. & Merino, I.L. (2011, March). Blog and Webinar as distance significant Learning building tools: A global learning experience for higher education professors. Paper presented at the 6th International Technology, Education and Development Online Conference.
Rhem, J. (1995). Deep/surface approaches to learning: An introduction. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(1), 1-5.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Richardson, A. (2002). Effective questioning in teaching mathematics using an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 18(12), 8-12. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ654563)
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863
Copyright (c) 2013 Rodrigo Polanco-Bueno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with HLRC agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication. Authors grant Laureate Education, Inc. a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in HLRC.
- Authors who submit manuscripts are to declare that their submission to HLRC is not simultaneously under consideration for publication in another journal and has not been published elsewhere previously.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the HLRC's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in HLRC.
- Pre-refereeing and pre-publication: To ensure consistency in the information available to researchers and to safeguard the blind peer-review process, authors are asked to abstain from self-archiving or posting online the submitted manuscript before the review process is complete.
- Post-refereeing and post-publication: Authors are free to self-archive and distribute the peer-reviewed and editorially reviewed version of their work. As a full open access journal, there is no embargo period. Authors are encouraged to archive the published PDF version, which includes a suggested citation with all pertinent information, including a digital object identifier (DOI). If the author decides to self-archive or distribute the work in a format other than the published PDF, the author must include the assigned DOI and acknowledge the work was first published in HLRC.